Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03558
Original file (BC 2014 03558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03558

   						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

When he first applied to the Air Force he was required to submit all of his convictions to the Recruiter and the Waiver Board.  He complied with that request and was granted a waiver to enter the Air Force.  Six months later, he was involuntarily released with a General discharge because of a prior arrest, which did not lead to a conviction. 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 18 Dec 79.

On 29 May 80, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, with a narrative reason for separation of “Misconduct—Fraudulent Enlistment—Board Waiver.” 

On 17 May 15, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  In response, the submitted a brief personal statement indicating he has been married for 27 years, raised a successful daughter, has a grandson, and has been a model citizen upholding all laws.  In addition, he submitted four character references from his family and an acquaintance (Exhibit D).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing.  Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.  The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed.  In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, other than his own explanation of why he received a General discharge the Board has no information concerning the stated criminal convictions or misconduct which served as the basis for his discharge, and there is no way for us to determine if the applicant’s accomplishments since leaving the service are sufficiently meritorious to overcome said misconduct.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03558 in Executive Session on 9 Jul 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Aug 14.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 22 Apr 15, w/atch.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 17 May 15, w/atchs.















Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03558

    Original file (BC-2009-03558.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant received an honorable character of service on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued for the period of 6 Sep 78 through 25 Jul 84. The applicant’s discharge case file is not included in his records. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 Jul 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03558

    Original file (BC-2002-03558.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    She received eight performance reports, all with a promotion recommendation of five, for the period 3 June 1993 through 1 February 2002. The applicant separated while serving the suspended portion of her Article 15 punishment; therefore, her RE Code should not be changed. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 14 May 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Ms. Brenda L....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01011

    Original file (BC 2014 01011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01011 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and correct his reason for discharge. On 27 Feb 89 the applicant was furnished a general discharge (under honorable conditions), for Misconduct – Pattern discreditable involvement with Military or Civilian authorities and was credited with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02349

    Original file (BC 2014 02349.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02349 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 27 Mar 84, the discharge authority approved the Conditional Waiver and ordered a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge without probation and rehabilitation. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02139

    Original file (BC 2014 02139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02139 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jul 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03558

    Original file (BC-2005-03558.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    All elements of a DFC for heroism approved (certificate dated) between 18 September 1947 to 2 June 2004 will not be reaccomplished to reflect “Valor”; nonetheless, individuals with these DFCs are authorized to the wear the “V” device.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant was awarded the DFC for extraordinary achievement and not heroism. Therefore, they recommend the applicant’s request for the “V” device...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01753

    Original file (BC 2014 01753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01753 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to conclude that the applicant’s post-service activities overcome the misconduct for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03558

    Original file (BC-2007-03558.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03558 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) code of "2K" be changed to "3A" so he can enlist with the Navy Reserve. AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial and states based on the documentation on file in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02821

    Original file (BC 2014 02821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02821 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 21 Dec 90, the discharge authority concurred with the findings and recommendations and directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. In the interest of justice, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02218

    Original file (BC 2014 02218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02218 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. He was credited with 3 years, 4 months and 25 days of active service. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting...